Is it true that WhatsApp is spyware, and all correspondence in it is available to hackers?

Is it true that WhatsApp is spyware, and all correspondence in it is available to hackers?

What is Whatsapp End to End Encryption | How to Use this.

Previous questionWhat is the right way to react if a girl sends her intimate photos, given that you like them?
Next questionWhere did the dancing undertaker meme come from?

answers (6)

Answer 1
August, 2021

He is the same spyware as Viber, line and other managers. They all care about security, but they will not interfere with the special services if they need something. This is my opinion.

Answer 2
August, 2021

The bottom line is that no matter what messenger you use WhatsApp, Viber, Telegram, you connect to the server of this service and the decryption key is still stored with this company, although they claim that they will not be able to decrypt your message. Those. the same Telegram has full access to what you write (except for "Secret chats"). Specifically, none of the popular instant messengers transfers to cybercriminals, i.e. Correspondence can get to attackers only because of some vulnerability in the messenger system itself, or it happens almost always due to the user's own lack of foresight, for example, did not leave WhatsApp on a laptop, installed malware (virus) on a smartphone, computer or opened a malicious media file in WhatsApp (although this problem was solved long ago).

Answer 3
August, 2021

No, this news and rumors about a "spyware update" came after a vulnerability was found in one of the application updates that allowed Trojans to be installed on users' devices and their data, not only correspondence, subsequently a lot of noise, now They are investigating this problem and promise to completely eliminate any vulnerabilities, the next update should be solid, while it is worth using with caution.

Answer 4
August, 2021

It is incorrect to call a messenger "Spyware". It's just a client that lets you transfer data. As for the servers, there are privacy issues. After all, WhatsApp was sold by its founders to Mark Zuckerberg, his company Facebook. And as you know, Zuckerberg (I can't stand him) sells data to government agencies for advertising. This company is following you.

I will cite as an argument the recent phrase of the UN Deputy Secretary General Farhan Khak :

At the moment, the UN's top leadership was advised not to use WhatsApp as an unprotected communication mechanism .

And also the phrase of the co-founder of the messenger Brian Acton :

I just sold my users' privacy for a big check, chose money. I made a compromise. And now I have to live with it.

And also remember the case with numerous hacks of people through a video sent to WhatsApp. Think back to the hack of the Amazon owner.

I think there is something to think about.

Answer 5
August, 2021

I think it is incorrect to believe that WhatsApp can be spyware, given its popularity, audience (size) and owner (Facebook). The main problem here (not only for WhatsApp, in my opinion) is that the larger the audience of the service, the more deplorable the result of various vulnerabilities.

Answer 6
August, 2021

Pavel Durov believes that due to the way companies treat the security of the data on the platform, it makes no sense for the user to trust the security of the information that is transmitted to WhatsApp. I do not have the same competence as Pavel and cannot analyze which messengers work better and which do not. But there the encryption system used by Pavel is very serious and it really makes messages inaccessible for security - it is not surprising that it is Telegram that is blocked in Russia. The messages that are transmitted there are rather difficult to decipher, so far it has not been very successful. But it still works. So there is still a point in listening to what he says.

That's not the point. Each person encrypts his own message. When it is sent, it is encrypted in one way or another by the end user and the system does not know the cipher that the person himself is using. Everyone uses their own key and the system is designed so that no one knows this key except the user's client. When I send you a message, it is encrypted with my key. When the user receives it, he adds his key. After that, he goes back to the one who sent and opens with his key and, encrypted with the key of the last user, goes to him. Thus, it is always closed with either one or two user keys, they are both individual in nature, and with all this, the system cannot tell the FSB any universal key that would open all messages. This is the innovation of Paul's concept, and it seems to me that thanks to this, the protection became really better in the Telegram than in other places.

Before buying the messenger, everything was different for them and it has become different. This is what Paul is writing about and I don’t want to retell it.

Related question

Is it true that GCC generates the slowest and most sub-optimal machine code of all available C / C ++ compilers?

Read more

"Humpty Dumpty" exhibited information archive of personal letters and correspondence for auction Kiseleva on Whatsapp. How do they manage to get it all?

Read more

Is it true that Russian hackers hacked the website of the US Democratic Party?

Read more

5 TERRIFYING Things your Smartphone can do!

Photo, small WhatsApp correspondence and a couple of minutes of phone conversation. Based on these data, is it possible to draw a conclusion about the interlocutor?

Read more

Putin said that it is possible to change (mask) IP-addresses in such a way that the hacker attack would become "Russian". How is it done and who?

Read more

Is it true that instant messengers hide correspondence, and besides the communicators, no one knows the essence of the conversation? How it works?

Read more

How to save information from an account in VK so that if it is deleted, all correspondence, photos, etc. will be saved?

Read more

Is it true that the special services wiretap telephone conversations / read correspondence on social networks if they are talking about something illegal?

Read more

Access WhatsApp's Media, Documents & Audio from Kali Linux and Metasploit (Cybersecurity)

Is it possible to use a different country number in WhatsApp in a certain country?

Read more

Is there one messenger to which you can connect all chats (Facebook, iMessage, WhatsApp, Telegram) and conduct all conversations from one application?

Read more

Is it true that there is no love between opposites and only similar people live together all their lives?

Read more

Is it true that the daughter of the first cosmonaut, Elena Gagarina, said that her father did not fly into space and that it was all a reenactment?

Read more

Is it possible to make sure that I go to the blocked sites through the torus and those available without it (so that the switching happens by itself)?

Read more

Online WhatsApp hack by Mobile no. Just one Click Behind Reality}

Is it true that the Kremlin is going to shoot videos exposing Navalny? What's going on at all?

Read more

In VK, you can make publications available only to friends. Firstly, why is it possible to do this only from the phone, but not from the computer? And secondly, can you choose to see certain friends, and not all?

Read more

Is it true that all the music has already been written?

Read more

Is it true that all activities on the Internet are monitored by special services?

Read more

Is it true that the Universe is infinite, and if so, how can you visualize it (after all, everything has its end)?

Read more

Hackers show ways to protect your iPhone

Is it true that if you go to someone's account in ask.fm, he can read the link and use it to figure out that it was you?

Read more

Why is there one checkmark in WhatsApp dialogs, and when does the second appear? What does it depend on?

Read more