Is it worth continuing to communicate with those who watch talk shows on federal channels and vote for Putin? As for me, they do more harm than subscribers with outhouse humor
MDK is already 9 years old and this is one of the so-called "oldest" publics on an equal footing with two, signed a long time ago and sometimes there is something really funny, from which you can catch lulz
Ovsyayayarka seer, hey, and you sharish za hayip? Did you see the meme on the foreche, is it immoral? Have you seen gear in condensed milk? Did you hear the news at the MDC? Subscribed to saves?
Good day. To this, I would also add that you should not communicate with a person who has an account in Kwai and similar garbage. Especially if a person actively uses it and makes videos in it.
No, it’s worth it, only if he is a member of the MHC public and the rest of the pseudo-intellectual pays ... Just a joke, this should be sent to hell right away (to 140)
Do not hang labels on people about whom you know nothing at all. Most go to such publics just to relax and laugh at jokes that seem funny to them. The sense of humor is also individual. And almost many memes have their origin there.
On my page 332 subscriptions to various publics, I browse at most 10-20 that come across in the feed. I don't even remember exactly what groups there are, because they are simply not interesting to me, but at the same time they do not bother me to search and delete them.
Let's take APP as an example. In its essence, it is a public about nothing. Ridicule of the fair sex (but at the same time, periodic stuffing of sexy girls), humorous pictures and, perhaps, something else. Of the above, I do not support ridicule at all, those same sexy girls are not more interesting to me either (the taste is a little wrong, probably), sometimes funny picches come across because of which I am in it. The rest of the APP is not interesting to me.
But at the same time, I occasionally go to 4ch, although I am not subscribed to it. Degradation time, development hour (no).
Therefore, you should not judge a person by his subscriptions. They, of course, can create some kind of impression, tell you about some of the person's preferences, but no more. Everything will become clear only during communication.
Memes are funny, there is a sea of sarcasm! My friends and I, for example, laugh with the thought "what kind of person came up with this, and what is in his head." If I can laugh at jokes about "hachey", the Russian Orthodox Church, the dead people - this does not mean that I am a degradant. You just don't have to take it so seriously
I was at one time subscribed to the MDK, because I liked how people were bombed from it. Many people immediately gave up on me, deleted me, stopped communicating, etc. Thus, I myself filtered out those people who are not subscribed to such public pages, but could be their typical visitor :)
I would say on the contrary, is it worth communicating with a person who is seriously asking such a question. In my life I have met people who were subscribed to all sorts of near-intellectual publics and they were the most boring pieces of shit, while also with excessive PSV, and opposite good guys with whom it is pleasant to communicate, but it so happened that on the Internet he prefers to eat shit ... But back to what I wrote at the beginning of the post. If a person seriously considers his hobbies on the Internet to be something serious in order to judge people and generally creates criteria for still potential friends by their hobby, then as for me this is a rather not distant person.
Is it really possible now to judge a person by the criterion that a person is viewing the MDK tape ??? wow! I know a lot of people with an excellent mind and sense of humor who sometimes watch public and just laugh. Yes, there is enough cynicism and cruelty in him , but you can just laugh at some moments and throw them out of the brain) what's wrong with that) my grandmother is the smartest woman, but sometimes she looks through house 2, just because an hour later he flew out of her head, and she would laugh at the participants)
What's the difference in which publics a person is sitting, if you like communication with him, then why should this be an obstacle. 140 forty characters to write
I love all sorts of stupid memes and funny pictures, I always share the top ones with my friends, everyone likes it. Are we all dumb now? I bet ...
Why are silly jokes good? Clever jokes are inaccessible to dumb people, but dumb jokes are available to everyone. A clever person is even funnier with stupid jokes, because he understands how stupid they are. If a person, however, considers himself smart, but denies low-quality jokes, this is a reason to think about whether he is a hypocrite. If you communicate with a person, you probably know if he is smart or not, he has a good sense of humor or not. If so, how can the public change your mind? If not, how did you communicate then? An intelligent person, moreover, will not succumb to public opinion, but will make it up for himself. Here's an example: I somehow immediately and long ago joined the wave of opinions that the Comedy Club is bad taste and there can be nothing funny there, by definition. However, my less highbrow and more open friends sometimes show me funny and very subtle sketches from there. It is not weird for them to think that they will disown them after learning that they are watching the branded Comedy Club, and their friends, accordingly, will not even think about a person in public.
I looked through this MDK of yours, three or four scrolls down was not funny. But that doesn't mean that a witty post can't appear there.
You shouldn't judge a person at all by his page (s) on social networks. Most often, people try to look more extravagant, noticeable, fashionable there, and not as they (we) really are.
I must say right away that I was subscribed to several publics with stupid / immoral humor, which of course does not add to my attractiveness, but what angered me was the feeling of superiority in the matter, like, look what kind of cattle he is, is it worth stopping to his level? In general, this is how I see this situation: you communicated with a person, everything is fine, and then once, I noticed that he was signed up for the MDC, and that's all, his jokes became stupid at once, and he was a bit catty. One gets the impression that the author is so prone to herd instinct that he cannot understand if he likes communicating with a person, it does not matter whether he is subscribed to the MDC or not.
Rather, you shouldn't communicate with someone who formulates such a question. What kind of stupidity?
If you like this person, talk to him as much as you like, just like vice versa. A person subscribed to Ida and Po can turn out to be quite pleasant and interesting with the same probability that a person subscribed to intellectual audiences turns out to be a gray down.
Your question is incomprehensibly superficial and stupid. Why can't you do what you just want?
God, the person is subscribed to MDK, but let's not communicate with him. This is such a cliché! TQ - the first, MDK - the second, mixed feelings? Just a circus, post of arrogance, can't a person be subscribed to MDK (Eaglet, dvach, fochan) and go to the sites habr, tproger, science and technology, pikabu, listen classical music, etc., to get carried away with architecture and art, as my experience shows, it is much easier to find the information you are interested in, an article on any topic on the site than to "rummage" in groups. But no, you are labeling a person. But you are such a fine fellow, you do not succumb to the mainstream.
One thing is interesting to me - why is there so much diarrhea against MDK? Yes, it is fundamentally different in content from the generally accepted norm, but very often it reflects the truth in a harsh and unpleasant form in many industries, from politics to sports. As for me, this is very important and necessary, like a trashy movie for a brain shake. And who is not capable of "passing through" the stupid jokes of the MDK - maybe you simply are not able to master it?
Of course you will excuse me and you can minus half to death, but what the fuck is this question for nonsense? Judge for yourself, based on the question you refer to people with whom you have to stop communicating about several million. Let's say you have about 200 people in your friends, every third probably subscribed to one of these publics, rudely you stop communicating with each of them and as a result you have 66 favorites who remain, at least 10% will have a left page and from it he will be subscribed to these publics, this is already 59 people you have left, and also do not forget that some will just enter, this will surely leave 20 people. Now let's think about what 20 people are. We will immediately discard 3, because these are people who do not subscribe to anything and in general they created a page for study-work. 17. But these remnants are already complete trash, these are the people who do not follow the mainstream and are in the crowd that decided to stand out from the crowd, no one decides for them, and in general they are sociophobes, misanthropes, extroverts and other crap that sits at home, and oh yes , they are also signed for two, three, four hours. On those publics that post something that does not risk the MDC. In short, why am I doing this, you better remove those who repost the entire Internet, those with whom you, in principle, are not pleasant to communicate, and also yourself and go to the Czech Republic, there is delicious beer.
And here it is again: black and white, a world of extremes, patterns and contradictions. There is no more unfair assessment for a person than the one that is based on habits, views, and even more so, subscriptions in social networks. Do not rate, appreciate
I advise you to pay attention not to subscriptions, but to a person's wall. The VK wall in modern times is a purely intimate thing, only important and valuable things in the opinion of the owner are posted / reposted there.
Thus, if we see reposts on the wall about:
quotes from the soul, bro, to the soul, ridiculous with mdk. etc,
song kits for training, recipes for a simple dish from a thousand ingredients,
pranks for repost,
quotes from great people,
So these things are important to a person and reflect his views. It is here on the shore that you can and should decide whether a person is worthy of your communication.
This is such a cliché! Many people do not even subscribe to the MDK, but go to it. This is a question from the series “Is it possible to communicate with a person who admits that he is d ** chit?”.
I'm sure that if a person does not go to the MDK, it does not mean that he goes to other, no less degrading public pages, and looks at no less degrading pictures that simply appear faster on the MDK. The difference is that a person, choosing which toilet to sip from, prefers the less well-known. Because it aggregates in any case the same shit in essence.
People are different. A bad sense of humor can be offset by other positive qualities. It's hard to characterize a person just by their account.
I'm telling a life hack for those who don't know. In the news section on VKontakte, you can create your own tabs (no more than five). We create a tab and send all our MDK-like and other publics there. Now, whenever we want to see what's new, go to the news and go to our tab. When viewed in this way, the visit is not recorded and these publics will not be visible on your page, but will be far in the depth of the list of "Interesting Pages". Public pages related to your university, city will come to the top. You will look more educated. It's good if it is kudago, for example, or something like that. You can even completely unsubscribe from these publics, they will still remain in your tab.
The answer to your question is this. If desired, the public can even be hidden from prying eyes. In my opinion, there is nothing illegal if you view them on the train and subway on the road in the morning and in the evening. Everything is good in moderation when it does not go to the detriment of the main activity. Moreover, I can say that they are often even useful. Life hacks, interesting places that are not so easy to find out about, facts of life often appear there. They improve your sense of humor, help you look at many things differently. It was pointed out above that there are people who retell memes. Yes, I agree, this is already bad. Memes are not anecdotes, they are created only for individual contemplation, and not for telling in public. Therefore, reposting to your page is also not worth it. But from the point of view of business, for example, it is good to know what your main audience is breathing, because promotion through social networks has not been canceled. Therefore, I see no apparent reason to score on a person only if he is like everyone else.
I would pay more attention to ideological subscriptions, although in my experience, even a quilted jacket with an oppositionist can communicate with pleasure, the main thing is not to touch on fundamental topics. However, if this is so important to you, why not? I believe that everyone has the right to filter their social circle as they see fit.
Depends on the person. There are quite smart, interesting people who subscribe to a similar kind of public just to unwind. And there are people who are stupid as a cork who repost quotes "I love the smell of a new book" and "there is a crime worse than burning books - not reading them" and are proud of not subscribing to the MDK. Usually people who wry their noses at the sight of MDK in subscriptions are those who thought and decided that it is now possible to be smart and consider it their duty to inform the whole world that MDK is cultureless and pathetic. Smart people don't care if someone subscribes to it or not. I will make an assumption, perhaps incorrect, but the author has revised Larin.
I don’t understand at all how you can subscribe to such communities by accident or, say, because you liked a couple of posts. Judging from my own experience, I can say that I read all the communities I subscribe to regularly, and I just unsubscribe from unnecessary ones. Accordingly, if among the subscriptions there is a MDK or any other similar public, then the person reads it, likes it and he likes it. Therefore, it is better to limit communication with such people. Or not at all.
Subscriptions in social networks are one of the signs by which you can judge a person. But do not forget that any sign and any information should be considered exclusively in context. So you should be on your guard, but do not immediately run away from a person when you see an "unworthy" public in your subscriptions.
If his interests are limited to this, then perhaps not. But maybe he himself is an intelligent and interesting person who just loves to sometimes read public pages with stupid jokes. In this case, you should not put an end to it. Some subscribe to everything in order not to lose, but they do not read the feed - they look at the page of a specific person, news or humorous public, according to their mood. To draw conclusions about a person only by what he has in his subscriptions is also not from a great mind, I am protecting.
If he thinks these are really worthwhile and funny publics (and quotes jokes from there), then definitely not. As practice has shown, I personally have nothing to communicate with such people, and they are of no interest to me as interlocutors.
A person can and should be judged by the information space he has surrounded himself with, in the end it is his conscious choice. If this is MDK and / or MHK and the like, then this is a bad call.
To be honest, I sometimes like to visit such groups just to laugh at the stupidity of posts. But I think it's worth just asking the person about his opinion about these groups, and then drawing conclusions.
I don’t think it’s worth making straightforward conclusions. Perhaps, in the public, the person liked only a couple of posts, and he decided to subscribe. And after finding out that the group sucks, I don’t unsubscribe just because I’m too lazy to surf the list of my communities.
I, for example, once subscribed to "how I met tetanus" and "These are the facts!" There rarely comes across something worthwhile, but it still hangs in subscriptions.
And if a person is fond of such groups, it is always worth evaluating him separately; no stereotypes.