Since January 1, 2016, the so-called law "on the right to be forgotten" has been in effect in Russia. This law obliges search engines, upon a citizen's request and without a court decision, to remove links to illegal, inaccurate or irrelevant information about the applicant from search results from search results.
During the law's period, Yandex received more than 3600 requests from 1348 people. Here's how these messages were categorized by topic:
The right to delete from wherever it is possible (from documents, from databases, etc., up to Internet searches) all information about an episode from your past.
For example, information that you were raped in childhood.
Or, information that YOU were in prison for rape.
The right to be forgotten is a human right, spelled out in the law since 2016, to eliminate irrelevant, defamatory, personal information about oneself from Internet search engines. In other words, you can remove links that appear for a specific search through a search engine, but they will still be available for other requests or directly at the address.
Situations in which you can use the right to be forgotten:
This information is no longer valid.
Personal data law has been violated.
And situations where the right to be forgotten will not help:
If the information is in doubt, there is insufficient evidence.
The information has not yet expired.
None of the laws of the Russian Federation have been violated.
To remove information from the Internet in this way, you must submit an application completed in a special form to the support service of a specific search engine. The term of consideration is 10 days.
Good afternoon! In short, this is a mechanism that hides part of the information about a person from search engines. The information will remain on the sites themselves. You can “forget” inaccurate information that is outdated or disseminated in violation of Russian laws.
The problem is that the right to be forgotten almost does not work, and when it does, it rather hurts. We have considered this issue in detail in a large analysis. Speaking thesis, then:
A court decision is needed. Search engines cannot decide what is true and what is not. Let's say Ivanov wants to use the right to be forgotten in order to hide the publication “Ivanov is a swindler and a bribe-taker”. However, search engines do not have the authority to decide whether this information is reliable or not. So they ask for a court decision.
It's easier to ask for removal. If you go to court anyway, why not immediately request removal? The court decides whether the information is unreliable. If the applicant wins, the negative will be removed from sites and search engines. In this case, it is strange to interrupt with a half-measure like the right to be forgotten.
Publicity. It is unlikely that MP Valery Gartung, Mikhas and the prime minister's son-in-law wanted to achieve additional publicity when they used their right to be forgotten. However, these stories have become the property of the media. For example, Google notifies sites that some of their content will be hidden from search results.
Doubtful reputation. Search engines have not shared data on the right to be forgotten since 2016. Then Yandex positively considered 27% of applications, and Google - 26%. The mention of the right is connected with the desire of Vitaly Milonov to hide the attack on a gay club, etc.
To be honest, it is difficult to advise turning to the right to be forgotten. Yes, this is a simple procedure. It is enough to fill out a questionnaire with the required search engine: Google, Yandex or Mail.ru. All the nuances are described there. However, efficiency is a big question.
Since 2016, in practice, there have been no cases when the right to be forgotten was competitive with other methods of removing negativity. To get rid of inaccurate information, contact the Reputation Moscow agency for advice.
The right to be forgotten is the ability to require search engines to remove Internet pages with information about you from search results. Generally, if this information is false or offensive.
In Russia, the law giving such a right has been in effect since January 2016. It gives a citizen the right to demand, among other things, the removal of any "irrelevant information" about himself. By law, this is information that has lost its meaning due to subsequent actions of the applicant or events. For example, when changing jobs - when information about previous work is no longer relevant.
Yandex's position on the right to be forgotten can be found here. According to the IT company, “by law, a person has the right to demand that a search engine remove links to inaccurate, illegal or irrelevant information only about himself and only when these links are searched for by queries containing his name or surname. we are faced with a lack of understanding of the law or attempts to abuse it. "
Is it ethical (with a robotic body) to keep such an AI in a locked lab?